Shadow of Mordor
contract?
Yes, Jim is right.
Why are these marketing people pulling so hard to give a controlled
positive buzz, given that the game currently
has 85% to 87% on metacritic? This is a tie-in game and it has a
positive vibe to it already. I can almost understand, but not like,
why Microsoft was doing with their hidden marketing thing, because
they were completely in the shitter with XB1. However Microsoft almost found itself breaking the law with their agreement. With this, it feels like
the shadow peeps simply don't have faith in their own game.
Not revealing bugs
also rubs me the wrong way. How about dvs try to make the game as
bug free as possible? LPers stumbling on them is part of the thing about Let's Plays. And, what happens if there is a bug that
breaks the game (IE Superman 64)?
And, the strangest
rule not mentioning the connection to the movie series of characters.
This is the dumbest thing I've ever heard, because Warner Brothers
distributes the Hobbit films and this game is being published by
Warner
Bros. Interactive Entertainment. They are owned by
the same company. Heck some the movie designs are in the damn game.
That's the part of
the contract that leaves me confused. Why distance the game from the
material it is based on? Clearly the game is set in the movie universe.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment