This controversy has rippled
through comic book fans through the Internet. I personally don't
think this is the Gamergate of comic books because it is just a
variant cover. Let's get into it.
The reason why this cover is so
important is because it calls back to an important story in the
Batman history, The Killing Joke. In that twisted story, the Joker
gets loose and shoots Barbra Gordon in the spine and kidnaps
Commissioner Gordon. He tortures Gordon and Gordon can longer walk.
People attack that story for attacking women, esp Barbra. However,
the Barbra thing is a tool to show that Batman still won't kill the
Joker even though he's gone too far.
Bad things should happen to our
heroes/characters as long as it is appropriate for the context of the
story and makes logical sense. Showing our heroes rise from their
issues, such as Batgirl (in the original continuity) becoming a super
hacker despite her disability made her an amazing character to look
up to. She became Oracle, a hacker that helped out ALL of the DC
heroes including Superman. She became a powerful character after her
horrible ordeal.
When the DC universe rebooted,
for a fourth time, she ended up becoming Batgirl again. However,
everything that happened in the Killing Joke was still part of the
New 52 (IE DC reboot) history. In this new universe, Barbra healed
from her ordeal and was able to walk again. She went back to being
Batgirl. (It gets a little messy with reboots and history and stuff.
While I like the old Barbra
Gordon arc because it gave a good role model for people with
disabilities, I can see why the new rebooted (sort of) Batgirl is a
good role model for women and girls. But, we can't take away the
fact that the Killing Joke did happen to this version of Barbra too.
And, it shows that horrible things CAN happen to people and people
can heal mentally and physically. (Note: She was still Oracle in the
new universe too.)
She is a victim survivor that
turns herself around and becomes a hero again. She is a strong
female character because of what she's been through.
As the cover shows, she has to
get over her fear of what the Joker did to her in the Killing Joke.
If she defeats the Joker, it makes her a stronger character. This is
where I have a problem with the SWJs getting all up in arms over the
cover. There is history behind this cover and there is even more
history behind the Joker just fucking with people.
Side Note: The Joker once poised
Lois Lane and claimed the cure was in his blood. He told Superman
he'd have to kill him to get the cure. Batman actually had to talk
Superman down and let Lane die instead just so Superman wouldn't
throw away his principles. Come to find out, the Joker was lying and
the poison harmless disappeared from Lois' system. That's what the
Joker does.
Since it is just a variant cover,
it really doesn't matter. I'd be up in arms if DC had changed the
storyline due to pressure. So, this is really just more or less hot
air to me. I just believe every super hero man or woman needs a nemesis that is one of the worst of the worst. The Joker is that
character. And, I just want the people that protested the variant
cover to know there is a long history behind that cover.
Characters are supposed to rise
and fall and then rise again despite their gender, race or religion. That's what makes
them compelling.
No comments:
Post a Comment